Drawing for CHEOPS TECHNOLOGY CYBERDEFENSE

USPTO serial 79380342

CHEOPS TECHNOLOGY CYBERDEFENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHEOPS TECHNOLOGY CYBERDEFENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software; data storage devices; computer networking and data communication equipment; equipment and accessories (electric and mechanical) for data processingACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services; communication services via computer networks and providing access to data via the Internet; providing access to content, websites and portals; provision and rental of telecommunication equipment and installationsACTIVE—
042Outsourced services with respect to information technologies; development of computer hardware; software development, programming and implementation; hosting of Software as a Service [SaaS], Software as a Service [SaaS] and rental of software; rental of computer hardware and installations; computer security services for data protection and IT restoration in the field of data and applications; consultancy, advisory and information services in relation to information technology; computer data conversion and back-up (copying) services, data coding services being computer programming; scientific and technological services; engineering services; design servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 4, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 7, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 6, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 10, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance