Drawing for BFS

USPTO serial 79380538

BFS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BFS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard C. Gilmore

Richard C. Gilmore MASCHOFF BRENNAN GILMORE ISRAELSEN & MAU95 South State StreetSakai-ku, Sakai-CitySalt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Fishing reelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2026MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 2, 2026ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 1, 2026EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 10, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 29, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 11, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 10, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 9, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2023LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance