USPTO serial 79380988
YOAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIGAN, MATTHEW M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O. Box 230692New York, NY 10023United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing training of others for certification in the field of training of search engine optimization via the Internet and telecommunication networks; education services, namely, providing on-line workshops and courses in the field of search engine optimization via the internet and telecommunications networks; educational services in the nature of e-learning, namely providing online instruction in the field of search engine optimization via an online website; compiling teaching materials being the development and dissemination of printed educational materials of others in the field of search engine optimization; arranging and conducting of congresses, seminars, and lectures in the field of search engine optimization; organization of fairs and exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; producing of television and theater programs; producing and presentation of films and videos in the field of search engine optimization; publishing, editing and lending books, newspapers, magazines and other publications; providing online non-downloadable electronic books in the field of search engine optimization; writing of articles for websites, weblogs and online platforms, other than for advertising or publicity; productions of films, television shows and television programs incorporating interactive entertainment and game concepts; audiovisual production in the nature of sound and music video recordings; music production. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 14, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 13, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |