USPTO serial 79382322
BE LENKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OESTREICHER, SALIMA PARMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BE LENKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timur Slonim
Timur Slonim Law Office of Timur E. Slonim, Esq.86 Reno AveStaten Island, NY 10306United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Children's footwear; baby sandals; baby boots; footwear for women; footwear for men and women; women's foldable slippers; ladies' sandals; infants' boots; ankle boots; leisure shoes; casual footwear; slippers; knitted baby shoes; mules; booties being woolen baby shoes; baby bodysuits; snap crotch shirts for infants and toddlers; stuff jackets; coats; ladies' dresses; housecoats; trousers for children; babies' pants being underwear; rompers; one- piece clothing for infants and toddlers; pram suits; shirts; neckties; neckwear; short trousers; balaclavas; leggings being leg warmers; leggings; sunsuits; long sleeved vests; pants; nightwear; sleepsuits; overalls for infants and toddlers; fingerless gloves; stockings; swim wear for children; maternity bands being clothing; hosiery; baby bibs not of paper; toe socks; socks for infants and toddlers; non-slip socks; pyjamas; turtleneck shirts; neckerchiefs; scarves; mufflers as neck scarves; dresses for infants and toddlers; babies' undergarments; maternity lingerie; baby bottoms; shorts; skirts; sweaters; tee-shirts; tunics; baby tops; heavy jackets; dressing gowns; caps being headwear; knitted caps; snoods being scarves; children's headwear; muffs being clothing; footwear for men; men's sandals; | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 16, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |