USPTO serial 79382627
FUNKY CHIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JANSON, ANDREW KYLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUNKY CHIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Potato chips; chips (potato -); yucca chips; fruit chips; soy chips; coconut chips; yuca chips; banana chips; chipped potatoes; vegetable chips; chips (fruit -); frozen chips; apple chips; soya chips; kale chips; cassava chips; chips [french fries]; vegetable-based chips; fish with chips; purple sweet potato chips; low-fat potato chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Takeaway services; takeaway food services; takeaway food and drink services; restaurants; restaurant services; grill restaurants; delicatessens [restaurants]; tourist restaurants; restaurant information services; reservation of restaurants; ramen restaurant services; fast food restaurants; carvery restaurant services; providing restaurant services; self-service restaurants; carry-out restaurants; restaurant reservation services; washoku restaurant services; mobile restaurant services; japanese restaurant services; spanish restaurant services; tempura restaurant services; hotel restaurant services; restaurants (self-service -); sushi restaurant services; take-away restaurant services; take-out restaurant services; self-service restaurant services; fast-food restaurant services; bar and restaurant services; providing reviews of restaurants; salad bars [restaurant services]; booking of restaurant seats; restaurant and bar services; take-away restaurant services; providing information about restaurant services; udon and soba restaurant services; restaurant services provided by hotels; restaurant services incorporating licensed bar facilities; providing reviews of restaurants and bars; provision of information relating to restaurants; agency services for reservation of restaurants; travel agency services for booking restaurants; provision of food and drink in restaurants; serving food and drink for guests in restaurants; serving food and drink in restaurants and bars; making reservations and bookings for restaurants and meals; reservation and booking services for restaurants and meals; providing food and drink for guests in restaurants; providing food and drink in restaurants and bars; restaurant services for the provision of fast food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 14, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |