USPTO serial 79382775
POLARIS OFFICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIU, PHILIP
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLARIS OFFICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yan Song
Yan Song AEON Law, PLLC1718 E. Olive WayGangnam-guSeattle, WA 98102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded electronic documents in the field of how to use office productivity computer software; downloadable software for management of virtual currency; Downloadable multimedia file containing text, audio, video, and Internet Web Links relating to document management; Downloadable mobile gift certificates, namely, consumer coupons downloaded from a global computer network; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books in the field of how to use office productivity computer software; downloadable database management software, namely, document management; downloadable computer software for document design, creation, editing, publishing, featuring artificial intelligence functionality; downloadable computer software for document management using artificial intelligence; downloadable computer software for managing crypto asset transactions using blockchain technology; downloadable computer software for appointment scheduling and management; downloadable computer software for use as a electronic spreadsheet; downloadable computer software for sending electronic mail | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of virtual money software; development of software based on groundbreaking foundational blockchain technology; development of blockchain-based financial computer systems; development of blockchain-based software for digital asset management; development of blockchain-based prediction computer programs; development of blockchain-based online computer platform for digital asset management; development of blockchain-based software for e-commerce for digital payments and e-commerce transactions; Providing online non-downloadable software development tools featuring artificial intelligence processing for creating blockchain-based applications provided by a blockchain as a service (BAAS) provider; maintenance of software used in the field of e-commerce; constructing, namely, developing an internet computer platform for electronic commerce; computer software development, namely, document management, document creation, spreadsheets, electronic mail, office productivity software and blockchain-based applications featuring artificial intelligence functionality; maintenance and upgrading of computer software, namely, document management software, office productivity software, spreadsheet software, electronic mail software and blockchain-based applications; design of computer database for document management, office productivity applications and blockchain-based applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |