USPTO serial 79383170
THE CYBER-WHY COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2024
- Examiner
- RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with THE CYBER-WHY COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph G. Chu
Joseph G. Chu JCIP155 N. Lake Avenue, Suite 800Century SquarePasadena, CA 91101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in database management, in the field of computer security; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for use in database management, in the field of computer security; technical data analysis services in the form of computer security threat analysis for protecting data; computer security services, namely, testing and risk assessment of computer networks; network security services, namely test and risk assessment of electronic networks; research relating to computer security; security assessment services for computer networks; security risk assessment services in the field of computer systems; monitoring of computer system operation by remote access; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; remote monitoring of computer systems; analytical services relating to computers, namely, computer security threat analysis for processing data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2025 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2025 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |