Drawing for CECO

USPTO serial 79384455

CECO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANDERSON, DANIELLE LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CECO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yuval H. Marcus

Yuval H. Marcus Leason Ellis LLPOne North Lexington Ave., Suite 1200White Plains, NY 10601United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; make-up; eyelash conditioner being cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; exfoliating cleansing mousse being facial washes; facial wash cleanser; eyebrow pencils; mascara; nail polish; non-medicated skin care creams; non-medicated skin care preparations; skin cleansing creams and non-medicated lotions for skin; skin toners; facial beauty masks; hair care creams; hair care preparations; hair care lotionsACTIVE—
021Cosmetic brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 8, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 26, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 18, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 15, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 9, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance