USPTO serial 79386010
BOEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. LEONARD
MICHAEL J. LEONARD FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP212 CARNEGIE CENTER, SUITE 400PRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer; beer-based beverages; non-alcoholic beer-flavoured beverages; malt beer; wheat beer; imitation beer; non-alcoholic beer; soft drinks; fruit beverages and fruit juices; smoothies; fruit beverages; non-alcoholic flavoured carbonated beverages; non- alcoholic, non-milk based nut and soy based beverages, all not being milk substitutes; aperitifs, non-alcoholic; mineral water; carbonated mineral water; sherbet beverages; flavored water; flavored mineral water | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Low alcoholic drinks with an alcohol content of less than 7%, excluding beers; hard seltzer; alcoholic carbonated beverages, except beer; alcoholic cocktail mixes; alcoholic cocktails; alcoholic energy drinks; alcoholic mixed beverages except beers; ready-to-drink alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; liqueurs; distilled spirits not derived from grapes; all of the above goods excluding wines and other alcoholic beverages derived from wine and grapes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 24, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |