USPTO serial 79386152
MAXVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CREEF, DAVIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Biometric hand scanners; electronic notice boards; video telephones; cases especially made for photographic apparatus and instruments; electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; electronic control systems for turnstiles; electronic mechanisms enabling calculators to operate instruments; theft prevention installations, electric; fire alarms; holograms; wearable activity trackers; network communication equipment; global positioning system [GPS] apparatus; radios; transponders; intercommunication apparatus; video projectors; thermal imaging cameras; stereoscopes; stereoscopic apparatus; fingerprint biometric door locks; electronic access control systems for interlocking doors; buzzers; alarms; face recognition device; signal bells; optical character readers; electronic tags for goods; computer software applications, downloadable; interactive touch screen terminals; humanoid robot with artificial intelligence; telepresence robots; radio-frequency identification readers; led display; data processing apparatus; scanners [data processing equipment] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |