Drawing for DROOLS

USPTO serial 79386451

DROOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DROOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauren K. Tagarao

Lauren K. Tagarao Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid AveFloor 19Cleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Foodstuffs for animalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 28, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 13, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 30, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 1, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 29, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance