USPTO serial 79387587
PROJECT EADEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROJECT EADEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, machine tools and power-operated tools and apparatus for the production, processing and preparation of foodstuffs and their intermediate products, in particular for the production, processing and preparation of meat substitute products; machines, machine tools and power-operated tools and apparatus for the food industry; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment and processing of food and their intermediate products for the production of food for third parties; customer-specific manufacturing and production of meat and sausage substitutes and products predominantly consisting of meat substitutes and/or sausage substitutes and their intermediate products; food processing; rental of machines, tools and apparatus for the production, processing and preparation of food and their intermediate products | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research of foodstuffs; product development in relation to groceries; computerised food analysis services; inspection of foodstuffs; professional advisory services relating to food technology; scientific and technological services relating to groceries; development of technologies for making sustainable food; development of technologies for making meat substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing services, in particular licensing of technology, intellectual property and industrial property rights in the field of food production and processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |