USPTO serial 79388058
ASTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANNAH, JESSICA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer security engineering; computer security services (design and development of secure computer hardware, software and systems); computer security services (programming and software installation, repair and maintenance services); computer security services in the nature of providing authentication, issuance, validation and revocation of digital certificates; data security services (firewalls); identity validation (computer security); research relating to computer security; security risk assessment services relating to computer systems; verification of personal identification (computer security); network security services (test and risk assessment of electronic networks); security assessment services for computer networks; computer security services (testing and risk assessment of computer networks); computer network services; computer security consultancy; data security consultancy; internet security consultancy; telecommunication network security consultancy; technological consultancy; computer virus protection services; technical support services in the nature of monitoring, detecting, diagnosing, remediating, mitigating and resolving cybersecurity issues; technical support services in the nature of architecture reviews, vulnerability assessments, device and application penetration tests, network penetration tests, and threat hunting for of computer systems, industrial control systems, and networked devices; consulting services in the field of cybersecurity; consulting services in the field of management, monitoring, evaluation, control, analysis, investigation and security of computer systems, industrial control systems, and networked devices; design and development of cybersecurity systems; development, design, implementation, testing, analysis, and consulting services in the field of security, networks, access, authorization, authentication encryption systems for computers, industrial control systems and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 4, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |