Drawing for DTS

USPTO serial 79388288

DTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Makiko Coffland

Makiko Coffland Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 36003-23-1 Shiba, Minato-kuSeattle, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Tools for metalworking machines, namely, diamond turning tools, diamond milling tools, and diamond grinding wheels.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 5, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 5, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 18, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 10, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 9, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 2, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance