USPTO serial 79390104
LIFTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOZEAU, BRANDON THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIFTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Curtain drawing devices, electrically operated | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Radio transmitters in the form of remote controls and wall-mounted remote controls, for use in relation to the following goods: Roller blinds, Awnings, Window curtains, Light grids, Screens, Mosquito netting, Entrance gates and Garage doors; Electrical and electronic apparatus and systems for the remote control of the opening and closing of shades, screens, curtains, awnings, blinds and mosquito nets; Remote regulators, Time switches, automatic, Wireless transmitters, Time switches, automatic, Telerupters, Time programmers, Wireless receivers for blinds and screens; Blind control units; Software for controlling screen motors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |