USPTO serial 79390300
BLYCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLYCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design, development and implementation of software; implementation of computer programs in networks; maintenance of software; development of computer hardware and software; software engineering; development and maintenance of computer database software; design of computer database software; reconstruction of database systems for others; electronic storage services for archiving databases; hosting of databases; providing on-line non-downloadable software for database management; rental of computer database software; rental of database management software; technical project studies in the field of computer hardware and software; configuration of computer networks by software; configuration of computer software; configuration of computer systems and networks; advice relating to the development of computer systems; advisory services relating to computer systems design; advisory services relating to computer systems analysis; advisory services relating to computer based information systems; consultation services relating to computer systems; information services relating to the application of computer systems; information services relating to the development of computer systems; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; disaster recovery services for computer systems; computer systems integration services; development of computer software for use with computer-controlled switching systems; engineering services for applications on large and medium-sized computer systems; installation, maintenance and repair of software for computer systems; evaluation of performance of computer systems against bench-mark references; quality control relating to computer systems; development of software for secure network operations; development of technologies for the protection of electronic networks; provision of technical support in the operation of computing networks; civil infrastructure engineering services; consultancy and information services relating to information technology architecture and infrastructure; consultancy and information services in the field of information technology architecture and infrastructure. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |