USPTO serial 79390569
.DRM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with .DRM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software including in relation to graphic design, artistic works and animation; application software for use on tablet devices, mobile telecommunication devices and other mobile electronic devices including in relation to graphic design, artistic works and animation; electronic publications including in relation to graphic design, artistic works and animation; none of the aforementioned goods being related to digital rights management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, the design and development of computer software; provision of online non-downloadable computer software (application service provider) including in relation to graphic design, artistic works and animation; provision of non-downloadable software hosted in an online or cloud-based environment (application service provider) including in relation to graphic design, artistic works and animation; software as a service and platform as a service including in relation to graphic design, artistic works and animation; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to the aforementioned; none of the aforementioned services being related to digital rights management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2025 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |