Drawing for KRONOS AI-ENABLED

USPTO serial 79391309

KRONOS AI-ENABLED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GULIANO, ROBERT N
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRONOS AI-ENABLED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew T. Rissler

Andrew T. Rissler Patel IP, P.C.20700 Ventura Blvd. Ste. 235Woodland Hills, CA 91364United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Measuring apparatuses; measuring instruments; testing instruments for electronic equipment; computers; data processing apparatuses; computer recorded programs; probes for testing semiconductors; computer software for processing semiconductor wafers; testing apparatuses for semiconductors; sensor controllers; sensors used in plant control; electric and electronic components; microelectronic components; integrated circuits; integrated electronic circuits; integrated electric circuits; digital electronic controllers; Robotic Process Automation [RPA] software; hardware testing software; electronic boards; downloadable software for software development (IDE); semiconductor/microelectronics test requirements tracking software; semiconductor testing documentationACTIVE—
042Machinery testing; component testing; engineering testing; product testing; computing method, algorithm and software development and testing; conducting industrial tests; testing and analysis method design and development; software design and development; electronic circuits simulator; automatic software development tools; software compiler/transpiler; software simulatorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 5, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 11, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 2, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 1, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 20, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance