Drawing for ARIA

USPTO serial 79393681

ARIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLIS, BRIAN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L Baker

Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA92 East Main StreetSuite 302Somerville, NJ 08876

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030flourACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 4, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 3, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 4, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 3, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 19, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance