Drawing for OURA

USPTO serial 79393864

OURA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CREEF, DAVIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OURA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine C. Miller

Catherine C. Miller Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Peer-to-peer data sharing services, namely, electronic transmission of data among internet users; electronic transmission of messages and data; internet broadcasting services over computer and communication networks, namely, uploading, posting, displaying, and electronically transmitting data, information, messages, and emojis; providing access to computer databases in the fields of social networkingACTIVE—
045Internet-based social networking services; online social networking services provided via a downloadable mobile application; online social networking services provided via downloadable mobile applications featuring technology that enables users to view and interact with and participate in discussions about each other's biometric and fitness data; online social networking services provided via downloadable social networking mobile application featuring technology that enables users to form virtual communities and get feedback from their peers in the field of health, fitness, mindfulness, and wellnessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 11, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 3, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 9, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 1, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 20, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance