Drawing for MARIDENIM

USPTO serial 79393874

MARIDENIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 692
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALAO, OREOLUWA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARIDENIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Roppel

Andrew Roppel Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn. Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, footwear, headgear being headwear; jeans, trousers; coats, clothing jackets, blouses, skirts, suits, shorts, scarves, aprons, gloves and mittens, pajamas, negligee robes and bathrobesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2024PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 16, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 11, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 10, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 29, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2024LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance