USPTO serial 79394061
LTEBOOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LTEBOOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo V. Gureff
Leo V. Gureff Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, recorded, for allowing users to choose residential and individual proxies to ensure anonymity, security and speed of networks; computer software applications, downloadable, for providing residential and individual proxies; computer programs, recorded, for server proxies; computer programs, downloadable; computer software platforms, recorded or and downloadable, for residential and individual mobile proxies | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission of electronic mail; communications by fibre optic networks; communications by computer terminals; telecommunications routing and junction services streaming of data; rental of message sending apparatus; rental of telecommunication equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation of computer software; computer security consultancy; computer technology consultancy; internet security consultancy; computer software consultancy; telecommunication network security consultancy; data security consultancy; technological consultancy in the technology field of residential and individual proxies; updating of computer software; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; writing of computer code; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for shared and individual mobile proxies; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for shared and individual mobile proxies; providing virtual computer systems through cloud computing; computer services, namely, providing proxy servers to others; providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; rental of application software for shared and individual mobile proxies; development of computer platforms; computer software design; computer programming; off-site data backup; computer programming services for data processing; telecommunications technology consultancy; data encryption services; electronic data storage; maintenance of computer software; monitoring of computer system operation by remote access; rental of web servers; server hosting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |