USPTO serial 79394063
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Geissler
Martin R. Geissler Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Statues, figurines, plaques and works of art, made of porcelain, terracotta or glass; household articles for maintaining clothing and footwear, namely, boot jacks and shoe horns, buttonhooks, clothing stretchers, stands for clothes irons and hand-operated clothes wringers, shoe polishing apparatus being, shoe polish applicators not containing shoe polish, polishing cloths and gloves, shoe trees and stretchers; household or kitchen utensils being sieves, skimmers, spatulas and household containers; ice tongs; salad tongs; serving ladles; pestles for kitchen use; mortars for kitchen use; ice cream scoops; spatulas for kitchen use; scoops for household purposes; pouring spouts; ladles for serving wine; nut crackers, sugar tongs; salt and pepper shakers, hand-operated salt and pepper mills; reusable ice cubes; ice cube molds; kitchen paper towel holders and napkin holders; kitchen paper containers incorporating dispensers; kitchen paper racks; portable isothermic insulated bags and non-electric coolboxes for food and beverages; fitted picnic baskets including dishes; lunch boxes; household food storage containers; non-electric cookware, namely, pots, pans, dishes, and tableware, except forks, knives and spoons, namely, coffee services, tea services, scoops; beverageware, namely, glasses, drinking vessels and barware; bottle openers, electric and non-electric; mugs; coffee mugs; saucers; plates; egg cups; tankards, drinking vessels, drinking glasses, cups, drinking bottles for sports; coasters being tableware not of paper or textile, plastic coasters, leather coasters, and wine coasters of precious metal; oven heat-resistant pads being kitchen utensils; heat-insulated containers for beverages; thermally insulated containers for food; insulating flasks; toilet accessories being toilet brushes, toilet plungers, boxes of metal for dispensing paper towels; combs and sponges being bath sponges, scrub sponges, makeup sponges; brushes, namely, basting brushes, bath brushes, shoe brushes, brush-making materials; toothbrushes; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, cleaning cloths, cleaning pads, cleaning rags; unworked or semi-worked glass, except glass used in building; waste paper baskets; piggy banks; straws for drinking; skins of chamois for cleaning; dusters and cleaning pads for cleaning displays; beverage glassware, figurines, jam jars, plaques of porcelain and earthenware; vases; flower vases; beverage glassware for everyday use, including cups, table plates, kettles and jugs; works of art, of porcelain, terra-cotta or glass; oven mitts; potholders; tea services being tableware; toothpicks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2025 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |