USPTO serial 79395012
GRAN FINALE ITALIAN TRIPLE ORANGE LIQUEUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROTH, BENJAMIN H.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAN FINALE ITALIAN TRIPLE ORANGE LIQUEUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Weiss
Adam Weiss Patshegen IP LLC265 FRANKLIN ST.SUITE 1702BOSTON, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Brandies; mint alcohol liqeuers; rice alcohol; Alcoholic bitters; anise liqueur; anisette; Alcoholic drinks for use as appetizers, namely, aperitifs; arrack; alcoholic drinks except beers; wine-based drinks; alcoholic beverages, other than beers, made from sugar cane; alcoholic beverages except beers; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; grain-based distilled alcoholic beverages; Pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; distilled alcoholic drinks; Alcoholic cocktails; curacao; digestive alcoholic beverages, namely, digestifs being liqueurs and distilled spirits; alcoholic essences; alcoholic extracts; alcoholic fruit extracts; gin; brandy; mead; kirsch liqueurs; rum; sake; Alcoholic cider; Alcoholic pear cider; wine; wines; vodka; whiskey | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 14, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 31, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |