Drawing for RUTLAND

USPTO serial 79395139

RUTLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUTLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA K. SHEBAR

LISA K. SHEBAR Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP950 Main Avenue, Suite 710SUITE 710Cleveland, OH 44113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Architectural hardware made of common metals and alloys thereof all being parts and fittings for building doors, namely, metal door trim, metal door panels, metal door frames, metal door bolts, metal door latches, metal door handles, metal door knockers, metal door pulls, metal door fasteners, metal door hinges, metal door locks, metal chain door guards, metal door fittings, metal door rosettes, metal door kick plates, metal door pivots, metal door restrictors, metal door brackets; metal door units; non-electric door springs of metal; door friction stays of metal; metal door hardware, namely, metal door bolts, non-powered door actuators, keys and key cylinders; door holders of metal; door holding devices of metal; metal doors; door openers, non-electric, namely, foot-operated door openers of metal, hand-operated door openers of metal; door closers of metal, non-electric, namely, spring-loaded door closers of metal, hinge-pin door closers of metal, scissor-arm door closers of metal, slide-arm door closers of metal; metal door springs, non-electric; none of the foregoing used in relation to metal fences, namely, transportable and stationary fences of metalACTIVE—
007Electric door openers; hydraulic door closers; hydraulic door openers; electric door opening and closing apparatus; door closers, electricACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2026GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2026GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2026CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 14, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 14, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 24, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 8, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 14, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2025RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
May 12, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 1, 2025ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Feb 21, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 21, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 25, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 19, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 18, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 16, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance