USPTO serial 79395203
BIHUBTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NGUYEN, CINDY EVANS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIHUBTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabrics and textile products included in this class; textile fabrics for clothing manufacture; textile fabrics for manufacturing sportswear; textile products for making clothing articles; fabrics for use in the manufacture of articles of clothing; fabrics; textiles made of synthetic materials; laminated fabrics; coated cloth for use in the manufacture of waterproof garments. | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headwear; sports clothing; shirts; short trousers; T-shirts; socks; sweatshirts; sweaters; caps (headwear); foulards; jackets; housecoats; pajamas; sneakers; boxer shorts; baby booties; bibs; romper suits; one-piece pajamas for babies; bib overalls; suspenders; wristbands; tracksuits; neckties; casual clothing; swimwear and beach clothes; bath robes; lingerie and hosiery; gloves; belts. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |