USPTO serial 79395443
OLED HDR+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTYNOV,VIKTORIIA V
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OLED HDR+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly M. Young
Kelly M. Young Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street, N.W., Ste. 1100Washington, DC 20005United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Televisions; computer monitors; light emitting diode (LED) displays; digital signage display panels; digital signage monitors; recorded computer software for processing images and graphics; downloadable computer software for processing images and graphics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 27, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |