Drawing for ASCOR

USPTO serial 79395822

ASCOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 794
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASCOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KLAUS P STOFFEL

KLAUS P STOFFEL LUCAS & MERCANTI LLP30 BROAD STREET21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; engineering services; operational industrial research in the field of conveying and materials handling systems and elements; computer programming for the paper, cardboard and plastics processing industries, technical project planning services being engineering and IT project management services for industrial machines and installations in the paper, cardboard and plastics processing industry; all of the foregoing relating to warehouse management, material handling, material flow control and visualization solution for the corrugated cardboard industryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 8, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 8, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 8, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 31, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 29, 2025DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 29, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 27, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 15, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 14, 2025DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2025ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 14, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 14, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 14, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 14, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 25, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 25, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 25, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 3, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Dec 3, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 3, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 30, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 14, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 26, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 26, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 20, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 19, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 22, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 16, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance