USPTO serial 79396930
THEIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, BRIA MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THEIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Sullivan
Todd A. Sullivan Hayes Soloway P.C.175 Canal StreetManchester, NH 03101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for collecting data relating to brain waves and enabling users to store, analyze, compare and share this data; downloadable artificial intelligence software for analyzing data relating to brain wave frequency; radio frequency scanners, synthesizers, stabilizers, amplifiers and audio-frequency transformers; downloadable software for analyzing data obtained with brain wave frequency analysis equipment; none of these goods being in the fields of ocular, periocular and vision fields; none of the aforesaid goods being used in connection with photographic cameras, sensors, lenses, associated parts, related parts; none of the aforesaid goods being for use with software related to security or surveillance | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical diagnostic apparatus for analyzing brain wave frequencies; electronic brain nerve stimulators for medical purposes; devices for medical diagnosis based on the frequency of brain waves; none of the aforesaid goods being related to ocular, periocular and vision fields; none of the aforesaid goods being used in connection with photographic cameras, sensors, lenses, associated parts, related parts; none of the aforesaid goods being for use with software related to security or surveillance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |