Drawing for AZZAPP

USPTO serial 79397358

AZZAPP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 137

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AZZAPP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANET G RICCIUTI

JANET G RICCIUTI JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI PC2003 Kalorama Road NWWASHINGTON, DC 20009United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded software programs for use in the creation of digital business cards for purpose of sharing contact information along with digital profile as a short personalized custom website; recorded software programs for purposes of accessing and sharing digital business cards categorized as to interest, for posting content on a digital wall or on backs of digital business cards, and for internal social networking chats; software packages consisting of downloadable computer software for use in the creation of digital business cards for purpose of sharing contact information along with digital profile as a short personalized custom website; software packages consisting of downloadable computer software for purposes of accessing and sharing digital business cards categorized as to interest, for posting content on a digital wall or on backs of digital business cards, and for internal social networking chats; downloadable databases featuring photographs, data, contact information, texts, documents, videos, music, weblinks; downloadable database server operating software; downloadable electronic databases featuring photographs, data, contact information, texts, documents, videos, music, weblinks; applications downloadable on stationary terminals and downloadable for mobile devices for use in the creation of digital business cards for purpose of sharing contact information along with digital profile as a short personalized custom website; downloadable software applications on stationary terminals or downloadable for mobile devices for purposes of accessing and sharing digital business cards categorized as to interest, for posting content on a digital wall or on backs of digital business cards, and for internal social networking chats; interfaces for computers; data recording, transmission and processing apparatus; data storage apparatus, namely downloadable computer software for the storage of data and informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 24, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 23, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 18, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2024LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance