USPTO serial 79397383
ORGANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORGANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ee Ming T. Bahk
Ee Ming T. Bahk Oliff PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile apps for retrieving and displaying health information; Downloadable computer software for biofeedback devices and bioresonance devices, namely software for collecting data from devices that can determine bio-energy information using silicon storage for analysis, therapeutic use and wellness enhancement; Downloadable communication and networking software for enabling access to the Internet, personalizing the content of e-mail communications, monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems; Downloadable social networking software; Downloadable data and file management and database software for accessing and managing databases; Downloadable media playing and publishing software; Downloadable office and business applications for managing user accounts, user payments, user subscriptions, user health information, correspondence with users; Downloadable software for monitoring, analysing, controlling and running physical world operations; Downloadable accounting software; Downloadable personnel management software; Downloadable customer management software and software for patient management; Downloadable diagnostic and application software for diagnosing and treating energy blockages on the physical, subconscious and spiritual level | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 3, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 2, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |