Drawing for WAFFENFABRIK

USPTO serial 79397502

WAFFENFABRIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAFFENFABRIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timur Slonim

Timur Slonim Law Office of Timur E. Slonim, Esq.86 Reno AveStaten Island, NY 10306United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Weapons, namely, riflesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 30, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 27, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 26, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 27, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 7, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance