Drawing for MIRACLEPLAY

USPTO serial 79397853

MIRACLEPLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANNAH, JESSICA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIRACLEPLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell S. Feller

Mitchell S. Feller Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman P.C.270 MADISON AVENUE, Suite 1403New York, NY 10016United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Game services in the nature of conducting online computer game tournaments, provided on-line from a computer network or mobile phone network; electronic games services in the nature of conducting online computer game tournaments, provided by means of the Internet or other communication network; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of online non-downloadable electronic, interactive, video electronic games; planning and arranging of online electronic game competitions; game services in the nature of conducting online computer game tournaments, provided on-line from a computer network for entertainment and further education purposes; providing information relating to computer gaming entertainment, provided on-line from a computer database or a global communication network; e-sports services, namely, entertainment in the nature of e-sports competitions; game services provided via communication networks, namely, online gaming services in the nature of computer game tournaments; arranging and conducting of mobile game competitions, namely, organizing electronic game competitions; arranging and conducting of game events, namely, gaming services in the nature of conducting online computer game tournamentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Nov 7, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Nov 7, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 17, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 28, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance