Drawing for ALPENGLOW HY

USPTO serial 79399202

ALPENGLOW HY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CREEF, DAVIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALPENGLOW HY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian B. Darville

Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land vehicles; sports cars; apparatus for locomotion by land in the nature of automobiles; automobile components, namely, suspension shock absorbers for vehicles; shock absorbers for automobiles; head-rests for vehicle seats; transmission shafts for land vehicles; gear boxes for land vehicles; hoods for automobile engines; automobile engine hoods; hoods for vehicle engines; automobile bodies; safety belts for vehicle seats; automobile chassis; hydraulic circuits for vehicles; safety devices for automobiles in the nature of inflatable air bags for use in vehicles for the prevention of injury in accidents; brake disks for vehicles; clutches for land vehicles; hub caps; windshield wiper blades; vehicle brakes; vehicle wheel rims; vehicle running boards; engines for land vehicles; land vehicle parts, namely, windshields; bumpers for automobiles; tires; luggage carriers for vehicles; doors for vehicles; vehicle wheels; rearview mirrors; vehicle seats; windows for vehicles; steering wheels for vehicles; fitted vehicle covers, all of the foregoing goods sold exclusively through authorized vehicle dealers and authorized vehicle service outletsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 3, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 3, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 26, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 25, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 22, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance