USPTO serial 79399351
STEEL INTEGRITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REYNOLDS,DYLAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEEL INTEGRITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Benni
Todd A. Benni McDonald Hopkins LLC600 Superior Avenue, East, Suite 2100Cleveland, OH 44114United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Paints, varnishes, lacquers; anti-fouling paint for boats, ships, oil-rigs; anti-rust greases; anti-rust oils; treatment preparations for preserving wood; coating compositions in the nature of paint for constructions, boats, ships and oil rigs; powder varnishes; powder varnishes for protective and decorative surface treatment of metal products, plastic products, medium density fibreboard (MDF) products, and wood products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |