USPTO serial 79399749
HABYT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OGUNFEMI, RASHEEDAT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HABYT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jutta M. Frankfurter
Jutta M. Frankfurter Riebling IP PLLC1717 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 1025Washington, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software and mobile applications for property rental and management; Downloadable software and mobile applications for managing tenant-landlord relationships; Downloadable software and mobile applications for connecting tenants and landlords; Downloadable software and mobile applications for real estate document management; Downloadable software and mobile applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing non-downloadable online software for real estate rental and management; Software as a Service [SaaS] featuring software for renting and managing real estate; Software as a Service [SaaS] featuring software for managing relationships between tenants and landlords; Software as a Service [SaaS] featuring software for connecting tenants and landlords; Software as a Service [SaaS] featuring software for managing real estate documents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 8, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |