Drawing for ROYAL GOURMET FINE INDIAN FOODS

USPTO serial 79400348

ROYAL GOURMET FINE INDIAN FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GANESH, HARINI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROYAL GOURMET FINE INDIAN FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bread; bread biscuits; fresh bread; garlic bread; pitta bread; pre-baked bread; semi-baked bread; snack foods consisting principally of bread; soft rolls (bread); stuffed bread; toasted bread; toasted bread products; coffee; tea (not medicinal); tea-based beverages; rice; buckwheat flour; chick pea flour; corn flour; dough flour; flour for baking; flour mixes; flour of barley; flour of corn; flour of millet; flour of oats; flour of rice; flour ready for baking; food products containing flour (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); food products made from potato flour; maize flour; pizza flour; rice flour; snack food products made from cereal flour; snack food products made from maize flour; snack food products made from potato flour; snack food products made from rice flour; snack food products made from soya flour; soya flour; unsorted wheat flour; vegetable flour; wheat flour; food products having a pastry base; frozen pastry; frozen pastry sheets; meat dumplings (cooked meat in a pastry envelope); pastry; pastry for spring rolls; pastry mixes; pastry products; puff pastry; spring rolls; samosas; canned sauces; cooking sauces; curry sauces; pepper sauces; pizza sauces; satay sauces; sauces (condiments); sauces for chicken; sauces for frozen fish; sauces for ice cream; sauces for pasta; sauces for rice; sauces for use with pasta; sauces in a pouch; simmer sauces; spicy sauces; stir fry sauces; tomato and vegetable based sauces; tomato based sauces; vegetable pastes (sauces); vegetable pulps (sauces); vegetable purees (sauces); curry spices; food pastes (spices); pizza spices; spices.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2026FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2026FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 1, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 30, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 26, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance