Drawing for IDEAL

USPTO serial 79400402

IDEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Scott

James L. Scott Privus PLC7125 Headley Street SEUnit 1084Ada, MI 49301

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Gardening tools, hand operated, namely mattocks, shovels, spades, hoes, digging forks, spading forks, weeding forks, rakes, and trowels; Gardening tools, namely, hand-powered cultivators for gardening; Hand tools, namely, picks; Hand tools, namely, scrapers; Hand tools, namely, weed diggers; saw teeth being hand tools in the nature of hand sawsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 12, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 11, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 6, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 5, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 26, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance