USPTO serial 79400402
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott
James L. Scott Privus PLC7125 Headley Street SEUnit 1084Ada, MI 49301| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Gardening tools, hand operated, namely mattocks, shovels, spades, hoes, digging forks, spading forks, weeding forks, rakes, and trowels; Gardening tools, namely, hand-powered cultivators for gardening; Hand tools, namely, picks; Hand tools, namely, scrapers; Hand tools, namely, weed diggers; saw teeth being hand tools in the nature of hand saws | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |