Drawing for IMPACK

USPTO serial 79400814

IMPACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYER, BENJAMIN A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMPACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katrina G. Hull

Katrina G. Hull Markery Law LLCPO Box 84150Gaithersburg, MD 20883-4150United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Packing machines; carton sealing machines; case sealing machines; cartoning machines; carton box sampling machines, namely, a mechanical device for automatically selecting, extracting and collecting from production lines samples of carton boxes, corrugated boxes and cardboard containers for quality control purposes; material handling machines, namely box flipping machines; material handling machines, namely box turning machines; material handling machines, namely case flap opening machines and case erectors; material handling machines, namely stacking machines; automated box bundling machine; material handling machines, namely batch inverting machines; window patching machines for boxes; machines for marking cartons; material handling machines, namely palletizers; conveyors being machines; conveyor lines; industrial robots for packaging; mechanical feeders and pre-feeders being machine parts for packing machines, carton sealing machines, case sealing machines, die-cutting machines, cartoning machines, carton box sampling machines, folder gluer machines, material handling machines, namely box flipping machines, material handling machines, namely box turning machines, material handling machines, namely case flap opening machines and case erectors, material handling machines, namely stacking machines, automated box and case bundling machine, material handling machines, namely batch inverting machines, window patching machines for boxes, machines for marking cartons and material handling machines, namely palletizers; spare parts and accessories for packing machines, carton sealing machines, case sealing machines, die-cutting machines, cartoning machines, carton box sampling machines, folder gluer machines, material handling machines, namely box flipping machines, material handling machines, namely box turning machines, material handling machines, namely case flap opening machines and case erectors, material handling machines, namely stacking machines, automated box and case bundling machine, material handling machines, namely batch inverting machines, window patching machines for boxes, machines for marking cartons, material handling machines, namely palletizers, conveyors, conveyor lines and industrial robots for packaging.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 8, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 11, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 10, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 30, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance