USPTO serial 79400905
FAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, MADELINE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
Bruce S. Londa Norris McLaughlin, P.A.7 Times Square21st FloorNew York, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for transportation logistics; Downloadable software for supply chain in the field of transportation logistics, logistics and warehousing management; downloadable mobile applications transportation logistics; Downloadable software for merchandise inventory management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Commercial management of logistics for third parties; business advisory services namely administrative and commercial advisory services for companies in the field of logistics and transport; business organization advice in the field of logistics facilities and means; inventory management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of logistics software, supply chain management and e-commerce portals; design and development of software for inventory management; electronic monitoring of operational centers for processing mail, packages and parcels, using computers and sensors [electronic data collection] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2026 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |