USPTO serial 79400927
CARTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic applications, software. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | E-commerce, gathering and collating of motor vehicle data in computer databases (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); providing of information relating to trading in motor vehicles, for a fee, for others; arranging of contracts for others for the buying and selling of goods; auctioneering, in particular in the internet; publicity and sales promotion services. | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services; providing access to information on the internet; procurement and rental of access time to databases (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); services of an internet provider. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing platforms on the internet (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); creation, updating and adapting of computer programs; providing, rental and maintenance of memory space for use as websites, for others; technical project management in the field of electronic data processing; design, installation, maintenance and updating of computer software. | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software [legal services]. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |