Drawing for VAN DER WAALS

USPTO serial 79402692

VAN DER WAALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VAN DER WAALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Lazouski

Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin Terrace, Suite 1Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sound recording apparatus; sound transmitting apparatus; acoustic conduits; audio interfaces; audio mixers; sound recording carriers, namely, blank compact discs; amplifiers; sound reproduction apparatus; electric and electronic effects units for musical instruments; speakers, namely, audio speakers; all of the above are limited to the field of music and exclude medical, scientific and research fieldsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 27, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 20, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 19, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 26, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance