USPTO serial 79402720
SADDAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SADDAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. Gerben Perrott, PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 500Washington, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Prefabricated buildings, not of metal; Non-metal masts being structures, namely, non-metal utility poles; Non-metal props, namely, non-metal construction elements in the nature of supports; Fences, not of metal; Non-metallic reinforcements for concrete and wood building construction, namely, building plates; Non-metal balustrades; Joists, not of metal; Non-metal building materials, namely, plastic pedestals for elevating pavers; Non-metal building laths | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services featuring building materials, not of metal; retail store services featuring transportable buildings, not of metal; retail store services featuring non-metal masts in the nature of poles; retail store services and online retail store services featuring building materials, not of metal; retail store services and online retail store services featuring transportable buildings, not of metal; retail store services and online retail store services featuring non-metal masts in the nature of poles; retail store services and online retail store services featuring non-metal construction materials in the nature of props; retail store services and online retail store services featuring fences, not of metal; retail store services and online retail store services featuring non-metal floor boards; retail store services and online retail store services featuring building panels, not of metal; retail store services and online retail store services featuring balustrades; retail store services and online retail store services featuring joists, not of metal; retail store services and online retail store services featuring non-metal structures in the nature of pedestals; retail store services and online retail store services featuring non-metal building laths | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |