Drawing for SUNDAYSUIT

USPTO serial 79402770

SUNDAYSUIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 774
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, AUDRIANA R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNDAYSUIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JIN J. KIM

JIN J. KIM ACI LAW GROUP, PC6 CENTERPOINTE DR.SUITE 630LA PALMA, CA 90623

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; Foam cleansers for personal use on skin; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely skin lotions, skin creams, skin toners, beauty serums, beauty gels, and facial beauty masks; Cosmetic preparations for bath and showerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2026ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 10, 2026OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2026OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2026OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 6, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 26, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 23, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 22, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance