USPTO serial 79403248
STRATALOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRATALOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical compositions for the reinforcement and strengthening of geological material including rock formations; injectable chemical additives for use as binding agents in mixtures for the reinforcement and strengthening of geological material including rock formations; gypsum based chemical compositions; bonding and binding chemicals for using in civil and mining works; chemical products for use in mining and civil works; concrete admixtures; binding chemicals for concrete and grout; bonding agents for concrete and grout; chemical additives for use with concrete and grout; chemical products for use as additives to concrete and grout; chemical admixtures for concrete and chemical additives for grouting materials; chemical additives for sealing materials and strengthening rock formations; accelerators for speeding up the setting of compositions; compositions for setting cement; set retarding agents; chemical preparations for stabilizing, sealing and strengthening used for introduction into permeable rock formations. | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Building materials, not of metal, for reinforcement and strengthening of geological material including rock; reinforcing materials, not of metal, for reinforcement and strengthening of geological material including rock filling cement and binding materials (other than chemical) for porous rock formations; building materials, namely, reinforced concrete and binding agents for use in civil and mining engineering; grouting compounds and materials including those that are gypsum based. | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of rock structures, namely, stabilisation and reinforcement services; provision of information, including online, in relation to rock stabilisation and reinforcement; ground, rock, soil and structure stabilisation, sealing and reinforcement services; rock drilling. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |