Drawing for BIRDYBOX

USPTO serial 79403399

BIRDYBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIRDYBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Instrumentation simulators; sound reproduction apparatus; audio apparatus; audio electronic apparatus; media contentACTIVE—
020Statues, figurines, works of art and ornaments and decorations, made of materials such as wood, wax, plaster or plastic, included in the class; furnitureACTIVE—
028Toys, games, and playthings; electronic toys; musical games; toy whistlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 15, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 12, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 15, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 14, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 13, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 12, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 5, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance