USPTO serial 79403425
AD CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLOTTI, CHRISTINA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AD CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telemetry devices for motor vehicles; telemetry devices for engine applications; telemetry apparatus; computer software for use in telematics; software for telematics solutions; computer software for vehicle tracking; computer software for vehicle fleet management; computer hardware for use in telematics; remote monitoring apparatus; computer software for use in remote vehicle monitoring; sensors; signalling apparatus; apparatus for the transmission of data; vehicle tracking apparatus; computer software for providing performance and diagnostic information and data relating to vehicles and vehicle fleets; computer software for providing information and data regarding the repair, maintenance and management of vehicles and fleets of vehicles. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telematics services; telecommunication services; rental of telecommunications apparatus; rental of data communications equipment; rental of telemetry apparatus and instruments for data recording and transmission; providing access to telematics and telemetry data on the Internet; vehicle communications services; advisory, consultancy and information services relating to all of the foregoing. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service [SaaS] in the field of telematics; design, engineering and development of software and hardware used for transmission or reception of information by electronic means, for vehicle communication services and for remote vehicle monitoring services; providing online, non-downloadable software in the fields of telematics and remote monitoring for vehicles; providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for telematics solutions; providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for vehicle tracking; providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for vehicle fleet management; providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for the provision of performance and diagnostic information and data relating to vehicles and vehicle fleets; providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for the provision of information and data regarding the repair, maintenance and management of vehicles and fleets of vehicles; Software as a Service [SaaS] for providing performance and diagnostic information and data relating to vehicles and vehicle fleets; Software as a Service [SaaS] for providing information and data regarding the repair, maintenance and management of vehicles and fleets of vehicles. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 1, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |