USPTO serial 79403729
NOVALIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOVALIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick F. Clunk
Patrick F. Clunk Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main Ave. Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded and downloadable software for transmitting images, audio-visual content, video content and messages via the internet; recorded and downloadable software for collecting, reviewing and evaluating patient data via the internet, managing databases for storing, organizing and retrieving medical data relating to patients and treatment plans; all of the aforementioned goods exclusively in the field of radiotherapy, radiosurgery and computer-assisted surgery, in particular neurosurgery and spinal surgery. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Planning, conducting and organizing conferences, symposia and training courses in the medical field, particularly in the field of radiosurgery and radiotherapy; all of the forementioned services relating to software, databases, devices, instruments and platforms as a service and exclusively in the field of radiotherapy, radiosurgery and computer-assisted surgery, in particular neurosurgery and spinal surgery. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service [PaaS] featuring software platforms for transmission of images, audio-visual content, video content and messages; Quality assessment and quality validation services for hospitals; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services, installation, maintenance and update of computer software, and troubleshooting of computer software problems for medical purposes, particularly for radiosurgical and radiotherapeutic purposes. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2025 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |