USPTO serial 79405454
LUMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOO, JEANE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley M. Stohry
Bradley M. Stohry Reichel Stohry Dean LLP6151 Central AveIndianapolis, IN 46220United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Artificial intelligence, machine learning and large language model software, namely, recorded and downloadable chatbot software for simulating conversation for use in obtaining information and feedback on contracts; Artificial intelligence, machine learning and large language model software, namely, recorded and downloadable chatbot software for obtaining analysis of legal data and legal documents; computer software, recorded and downloadable, for obtaining information and feedback regarding legal documents; computer software, recorded and downloadable, for converting legal documents into standard format; computer software, recorded and downloadable, for providing and managing digital or virtual data rooms and for communication in digital or virtual data rooms via data communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platforms for artificial intelligence, namely, software as a service (SaaS) services featuring chatbot software for simulating conversation for use in obtaining information and feedback on contracts; providing artificial intelligence computer programs on data networks, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence (AI) for obtaining analysis of legal data and legal documents; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software obtaining information and feedback regarding legal documents; software as a service [SaaS] for converting legal documents into standard format; software as a service (SaaS) for providing and managing digital or virtual data rooms and for communication in digital or virtual data rooms via data communication networks; rental and leasing of computer software for analysis of legal documents; rental of computer software for analysis of legal data and documents; electronic capture, scanning and storage of legal data and documents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |