Drawing for TRIOS

USPTO serial 79406264

TRIOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VO, KOMAL MAKHDOOM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anessa Owen Kramer

Anessa Owen Kramer Honigman LLP39400 Woodward AveSuite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Replacement brush heads for electric toothbrushes; electric toothbrush handles; electric toothbrushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 4, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 26, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 19, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 18, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 11, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance